June 21, 2007

Custody – David Hasselhoff

On June 15, 2007, former Baywatch star and singer, David Hasselhoff won full and physical custody of his two teenage daughters, 14 year-old Hayley and 17 year-old Taylor-Ann.

His ex-wife, Pamela Bach, has been granted alternate weekends and on Wednesday nights for dinner.

Hasselhoff%20%26%20Bach.jpg

Continue reading "Custody – David Hasselhoff" »

Bookmark: Bookmark Custody%20%E2%80%93%20David%20Hasselhoff at Google.com Bookmark Custody%20%E2%80%93%20David%20Hasselhoff at del.icio.us Digg Custody%20%E2%80%93%20David%20Hasselhoff at Digg.com Bookmark Custody%20%E2%80%93%20David%20Hasselhoff at Spurl.net Bookmark Custody%20%E2%80%93%20David%20Hasselhoff at Simpy.com Bookmark Custody%20%E2%80%93%20David%20Hasselhoff at NewsVine Blink this Custody%20%E2%80%93%20David%20Hasselhoff at blinklist.com Bookmark Custody%20%E2%80%93%20David%20Hasselhoff at Furl.net Bookmark Custody%20%E2%80%93%20David%20Hasselhoff at reddit.com Fark Custody%20%E2%80%93%20David%20Hasselhoff at Fark.com Bookmark Custody%20%E2%80%93%20David%20Hasselhoff at Yahoo! MyWeb

June 17, 2007

New Jersey Court Orders Retroactive Increase in Child Support Where Motion was Never Filed

Hamilton v. Mamroud, N.J.Super.A.D. 2007(unpublished opinion).

The parties had one son together. They divorced agreeing to joint custody with mother having primary residence.

Eleven years after the divorce, in November of 2001, the Middlesex County Board of Social Services notified both parties that either could seek a review of child support. The mother notified the board that she was interested in the review.

Thereafter, the father was notified by the Board that it was gathering his financial information from his employer. The board filed a motion to increase support on November 7, 2003, and then again on November 25, 2003 asking the court to make the increase retroactive to November 25, 2001(the date of the original notice).

Continue reading "New Jersey Court Orders Retroactive Increase in Child Support Where Motion was Never Filed" »

Bookmark: Bookmark New%20Jersey%20Court%20Orders%20Retroactive%20Increase%20in%20Child%20Support%20Where%20Motion%20was%20Never%20Filed at Google.com Bookmark New%20Jersey%20Court%20Orders%20Retroactive%20Increase%20in%20Child%20Support%20Where%20Motion%20was%20Never%20Filed at del.icio.us Digg New%20Jersey%20Court%20Orders%20Retroactive%20Increase%20in%20Child%20Support%20Where%20Motion%20was%20Never%20Filed at Digg.com Bookmark New%20Jersey%20Court%20Orders%20Retroactive%20Increase%20in%20Child%20Support%20Where%20Motion%20was%20Never%20Filed at Spurl.net Bookmark New%20Jersey%20Court%20Orders%20Retroactive%20Increase%20in%20Child%20Support%20Where%20Motion%20was%20Never%20Filed at Simpy.com Bookmark New%20Jersey%20Court%20Orders%20Retroactive%20Increase%20in%20Child%20Support%20Where%20Motion%20was%20Never%20Filed at NewsVine Blink this New%20Jersey%20Court%20Orders%20Retroactive%20Increase%20in%20Child%20Support%20Where%20Motion%20was%20Never%20Filed at blinklist.com Bookmark New%20Jersey%20Court%20Orders%20Retroactive%20Increase%20in%20Child%20Support%20Where%20Motion%20was%20Never%20Filed at Furl.net Bookmark New%20Jersey%20Court%20Orders%20Retroactive%20Increase%20in%20Child%20Support%20Where%20Motion%20was%20Never%20Filed at reddit.com Fark New%20Jersey%20Court%20Orders%20Retroactive%20Increase%20in%20Child%20Support%20Where%20Motion%20was%20Never%20Filed at Fark.com Bookmark New%20Jersey%20Court%20Orders%20Retroactive%20Increase%20in%20Child%20Support%20Where%20Motion%20was%20Never%20Filed at Yahoo! MyWeb

June 15, 2007

Divorce - Danny Bonaduce & Gretchen Bonaduce

On April 10, 2007, Gretchen Bonaduce filed for divorce from former “Partridge Family” child star, and now radio and TV host, Dante Daniel (“Danny”) Bonaduce after 17 years of marriage, citing irreconcilable differences.

According to the divorce papers, Gretchen is seeking legal and physical custody of their 6-year old son, Count Dante Jean-Michael V. and 12-year old daughter, Countess Isabella Michaela of the marriage, with visitation to Danny.

Danny%20Bonaduce%20pic.jpg

Continue reading "Divorce - Danny Bonaduce & Gretchen Bonaduce" »

Bookmark: Bookmark Divorce%20-%20Danny%20Bonaduce%20%26%20Gretchen%20Bonaduce at Google.com Bookmark Divorce%20-%20Danny%20Bonaduce%20%26%20Gretchen%20Bonaduce at del.icio.us Digg Divorce%20-%20Danny%20Bonaduce%20%26%20Gretchen%20Bonaduce at Digg.com Bookmark Divorce%20-%20Danny%20Bonaduce%20%26%20Gretchen%20Bonaduce at Spurl.net Bookmark Divorce%20-%20Danny%20Bonaduce%20%26%20Gretchen%20Bonaduce at Simpy.com Bookmark Divorce%20-%20Danny%20Bonaduce%20%26%20Gretchen%20Bonaduce at NewsVine Blink this Divorce%20-%20Danny%20Bonaduce%20%26%20Gretchen%20Bonaduce at blinklist.com Bookmark Divorce%20-%20Danny%20Bonaduce%20%26%20Gretchen%20Bonaduce at Furl.net Bookmark Divorce%20-%20Danny%20Bonaduce%20%26%20Gretchen%20Bonaduce at reddit.com Fark Divorce%20-%20Danny%20Bonaduce%20%26%20Gretchen%20Bonaduce at Fark.com Bookmark Divorce%20-%20Danny%20Bonaduce%20%26%20Gretchen%20Bonaduce at Yahoo! MyWeb

June 5, 2007

New Jersey Appellate Division Reverses Summary Judgment in Same Sex Equitable Distribution Case

Gruber v. Rixford, N.J.Super.A.D., 2007 (unpublished opinion).

A same sex couple purchased a townhouse together, in which title was held solely in defendant's name as was the mortgage on the property. The plaintiff expended approximately $55,000 toward the purchase of the townhouse.

After the parties broke up, the plaintiff alleged that the townhouse was a joint asset, subject to equitable distribution, giving him a 50% interest. In support of plaintiff's position, he alleged the parties had a verbal agreement that his name would be placed on the deed.

The defendant offered to pay plaintiff $93,000 as his share of the home and testified that plaintiff accepted this pay-off. Plaintiff acknowledged that the conversation took place but denied that he accepted the offer.

The trial court granted defendant's motion for summary judgment.

Continue reading "New Jersey Appellate Division Reverses Summary Judgment in Same Sex Equitable Distribution Case" »

Bookmark: Bookmark New%20Jersey%20Appellate%20Division%20Reverses%20Summary%20Judgment%20in%20Same%20Sex%20Equitable%20Distribution%20Case at Google.com Bookmark New%20Jersey%20Appellate%20Division%20Reverses%20Summary%20Judgment%20in%20Same%20Sex%20Equitable%20Distribution%20Case at del.icio.us Digg New%20Jersey%20Appellate%20Division%20Reverses%20Summary%20Judgment%20in%20Same%20Sex%20Equitable%20Distribution%20Case at Digg.com Bookmark New%20Jersey%20Appellate%20Division%20Reverses%20Summary%20Judgment%20in%20Same%20Sex%20Equitable%20Distribution%20Case at Spurl.net Bookmark New%20Jersey%20Appellate%20Division%20Reverses%20Summary%20Judgment%20in%20Same%20Sex%20Equitable%20Distribution%20Case at Simpy.com Bookmark New%20Jersey%20Appellate%20Division%20Reverses%20Summary%20Judgment%20in%20Same%20Sex%20Equitable%20Distribution%20Case at NewsVine Blink this New%20Jersey%20Appellate%20Division%20Reverses%20Summary%20Judgment%20in%20Same%20Sex%20Equitable%20Distribution%20Case at blinklist.com Bookmark New%20Jersey%20Appellate%20Division%20Reverses%20Summary%20Judgment%20in%20Same%20Sex%20Equitable%20Distribution%20Case at Furl.net Bookmark New%20Jersey%20Appellate%20Division%20Reverses%20Summary%20Judgment%20in%20Same%20Sex%20Equitable%20Distribution%20Case at reddit.com Fark New%20Jersey%20Appellate%20Division%20Reverses%20Summary%20Judgment%20in%20Same%20Sex%20Equitable%20Distribution%20Case at Fark.com Bookmark New%20Jersey%20Appellate%20Division%20Reverses%20Summary%20Judgment%20in%20Same%20Sex%20Equitable%20Distribution%20Case at Yahoo! MyWeb