June 25, 2011

Court: Grandparents’ Rights Not Automatically Terminated in Adoption

In New Jersey when a child is given up for adoption, the rights of the biological parents are terminated at the end of the adoption process. What happens, however, to the rights of the child’s biological grandparents?

Prior to the 1970’s, grandparents had no legal visitation rights. Then divorce rates began to rise and so did the number of single-parent homes. Grandparents began to take a more active role in raising their grandchildren and states began to adopt laws granting grandparental visitation rights. (1)

Today New Jersey law gives grandparents the right to seek visitation with their grandchildren if they are at any time denied such visits by the children’s parents. The grandparents must prove visitation is in the child’s best interest and the court will consider a series of factors when granting this request, including the relationship between the child and the grandparent(s), the relationship between the child’s parents and the grandparents, and the effect the visitation may have on those relationships. (2)

These rights usually come into play in divorce cases. Adoption is a different matter; here, New Jersey adoption laws and grandparent rights can conflict. A recent Bergen County case highlights this conflict.

In this case, paternal grandparents of two children applied to the Bergen County Superior Court for visitation rights after being cut off by the children’s adoptive parents. The judge ruled in favor of the adoptive parents, stating that the State’s adoption laws terminating the rights of the biological parents also pertain to the rights of the biological grandparents. The State Appellate Division disagreed. (3)

The Appellate Court pointed to several factors supporting its decision. First, the adoption laws that originally terminated the relationships between the child and the biological parents and rights of all other persons based on that relationship were repealed in the late 1970’s. The new act eliminates reference to other persons. (3) Second, the lower court’s decision was based on a precedent involving non-relative adoptions. In this case, one of the adoptive parents is the biological mother’s cousin. (3)

Finally, the adoptive parents themselves indicated through their actions that the adoption did not preclude the grandparents’ visitation rights, because they allowed such visits until the grandparents allegedly began to question their parenting methods. (3)

In short, the Appellate Court ruled that in New Jersey termination of the biological parents’ rights does not apply automatically to the rights of the biological grandparents in adoption cases.

(1) http://www.livestrong.com/article/206424-grandparents-rights-in-new-jersey/
(2) http://www.njdivorceonline.com/njpages/Visitation/grandparent_visitation_rights.asp
(3) http://www.law.com/jsp/nj/index.jsp?slreturn=1&hbxlogin=1

Bookmark and Share

June 11, 2011

Should Parents’ Citizenship Status Affect Child’s Rights to Financial Aid?

Financing a higher education is a daunting task that has high school seniors from all walks vying for whatever tuition aid is available. Because need far exceeds availability these days, it is only logical that criteria for eligibility be set. But when a New Jersey teenager’s application for state aid was rejected recently, it raised the question of whether a child born in this country should be denied such benefits because of his or her parents’ immigration status. (1)

Generally, state and federal student aid is available only to U.S. citizens, permanent residents or certain other eligible non-citizens. (2) Whether states should extend this aid to children of illegal immigrants has been the topic of hot debate not only in New Jersey but across the country. Supporters say children should not be punished for the actions of their parents. Opponents, on the other hand, fear that granting financial assistance to children of illegal immigrants would deplete funds available for legal residents and/or put an undue burden on taxpayers. Proposed legislation that would have made illegal immigrants eligible for in-state tuition rates in New Jersey did not even win enough support for a vote. (3)

The New Jersey case currently in the media and the courts puts a slightly different twist on the issue, however: the student at the center of this case was born in this country, making her a legal citizen. Like many of her peers, she applied to the New Jersey Higher Education Student Assistance Authority (HESAA) for a Tuition Aid Grant. HESAA rejected the application on the basis that her mother was not a legal resident. That decision is being appealed. (1)

HESAA eligibility requirements for state aid include, among other things, students being able to prove they have “domiciled” in the state for at least one year prior to school period for which they are seeking aid. For students under legal age, the burden of proof falls to their parents. (1)

Because the student in this case is just 17 years old, it is her parents’ residency status that HESAA considered. Since the mother is reportedly in this country illegally, it raises the question of how she can be a legal New Jersey resident. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is arguing, however, that state and federal constitutions prohibit discrimination against U.S. citizens and supersede HESAA requirements. (3)

(1) http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hZbGWoxmVFeJ87BcKXDTrUtbXGyQ?docId=690bfac6ae1345c997e9bb3d00a94d5e
(2) http://www.finaid.org/otheraid/undocumented.phtml
(3) http://www.heraldonline.com/2011/06/10/3138470/nj-student-aid-bid-rejected-due.html

Bookmark and Share