June 11, 2011

Should Parents’ Citizenship Status Affect Child’s Rights to Financial Aid?

Financing a higher education is a daunting task that has high school seniors from all walks vying for whatever tuition aid is available. Because need far exceeds availability these days, it is only logical that criteria for eligibility be set. But when a New Jersey teenager’s application for state aid was rejected recently, it raised the question of whether a child born in this country should be denied such benefits because of his or her parents’ immigration status. (1)

Generally, state and federal student aid is available only to U.S. citizens, permanent residents or certain other eligible non-citizens. (2) Whether states should extend this aid to children of illegal immigrants has been the topic of hot debate not only in New Jersey but across the country. Supporters say children should not be punished for the actions of their parents. Opponents, on the other hand, fear that granting financial assistance to children of illegal immigrants would deplete funds available for legal residents and/or put an undue burden on taxpayers. Proposed legislation that would have made illegal immigrants eligible for in-state tuition rates in New Jersey did not even win enough support for a vote. (3)

The New Jersey case currently in the media and the courts puts a slightly different twist on the issue, however: the student at the center of this case was born in this country, making her a legal citizen. Like many of her peers, she applied to the New Jersey Higher Education Student Assistance Authority (HESAA) for a Tuition Aid Grant. HESAA rejected the application on the basis that her mother was not a legal resident. That decision is being appealed. (1)

HESAA eligibility requirements for state aid include, among other things, students being able to prove they have “domiciled” in the state for at least one year prior to school period for which they are seeking aid. For students under legal age, the burden of proof falls to their parents. (1)

Because the student in this case is just 17 years old, it is her parents’ residency status that HESAA considered. Since the mother is reportedly in this country illegally, it raises the question of how she can be a legal New Jersey resident. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is arguing, however, that state and federal constitutions prohibit discrimination against U.S. citizens and supersede HESAA requirements. (3)

(1) http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hZbGWoxmVFeJ87BcKXDTrUtbXGyQ?docId=690bfac6ae1345c997e9bb3d00a94d5e
(2) http://www.finaid.org/otheraid/undocumented.phtml
(3) http://www.heraldonline.com/2011/06/10/3138470/nj-student-aid-bid-rejected-due.html

Bookmark and Share

October 27, 2010

Parents Fight School District’s 24/7 Behavior Policy

Can schools dictate student behavior when classes are not in session? That’s the basis for a court battle between parents and the Haddonfield School District. At issue is the District’s “24/7 Policy” which states underage students caught drinking will be barred from sports and other extra-curricular activities. (1)

The school contends that extracurricular activities are a privilege, not a right, and therefore can be taken away. It also claims students representing the District through sports and other activities can be held to a higher standard. Some parents, on the other hand, argue that the school is overstepping its bounds; monitoring a child’s behavior outside of school is a parental obligation. (2)

Earlier this month, Haddonfield School District won a round when a U.S. District Court refused to oppose the policy. The Court stated there was insufficient proof the policy violated anyone’s rights. As the school pointed out, students do not have to participate in any activities and, if they chose not to, would not be subject to the behavior guidelines. The District now is seeking dismissal of the lawsuit. (1)

The parents involved in the case, however, claim the policy is unfair, particularly to students who have not been convicted, but only charged, with underage drinking. (1)

Haddonfield isn’t the only District struggling with this issue. A similar case occurred in Mountain Lakes where a student was suspended from the girls’ basketball team after attending a party where other underage students allegedly were drinking. The girl’s father fought the school District’s decision. That case was settled out of court. (2)

It’s been reported that about half a dozen school districts in New Jersey have conduct guidelines their students are expected to follow year-round. How serious is the underage drinking problem? A recent study found that the national average age when a person takes a first drink is 14. In New Jersey that age is 12.5 years. (3)

(1) http://www.courierpostonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=201010050344

(2) http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2010-10-11-school-discipline_N.htm

(3) http://www.courierpostonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=201010170314

Bookmark and Share